Topic summary
⁠55%1 analyzed article/video1,282 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Defense Acquisition results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Anecdotal, and Hasty Generalization, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 572 hits. Analysis detected 2,855 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,128 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (14,360 of 23,916 topics). This Defense Acquisition is better (less manipulative) than 60.00% of the peer group.
Defense Acquisition
Topic details
Total words: 5,128
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

40% percentile
025507510040.0% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.4%7.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.9%1.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 11.2%11.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%Straw Man: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos