Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Data Center Referendum results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 4.3% saturation with 225 hits. Analysis detected 997 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,256 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 23,173 topics). This Data Center Referendum is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Data Center Referendum
Topic details
Total words: 5,256
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.8%1.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos