Author summary
⁠71%1 analyzed article/video1,032 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Simon D. Schuster results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias, Framing Effect, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 187 hits. Analysis detected 1,568 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,064 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (2,848 of 5,945 authors). This Simon D. Schuster is worse (more manipulative) than 52.10% of the peer group.
Simon D. Schuster
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠1%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠53%Simon D. Schuster (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,064
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Simon D. Schuster attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Simon D. Schuster vs sitewide
Simon D. Schuster attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos