Topic summary
⁠26%1 analyzed article/video670 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Data Accessibility results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 6.1% saturation with 164 hits. Analysis detected 1,252 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,680 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (16,351 of 23,460 topics). This Data Accessibility is better (less manipulative) than 69.70% of the peer group.
Data Accessibility
Topic details
Total words: 2,680
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

30% percentile
025507510030.3% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.2%2.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.4%1.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Middle Ground: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos