Topic summary
⁠78%1 analyzed article/video1,874 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dare To Dream results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Anecdotal, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 20.6% saturation with 1,158 hits. Analysis detected 5,333 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,622 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (9,839 of 14,979 topics). This Dare To Dream is better (less manipulative) than 65.70% of the peer group.
Dare To Dream
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠0%Alameda County1%
⁠35%Dare To Dream (selected)3%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 5,622
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Dare To Dream attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Dare To Dream vs sitewide
Dare To Dream attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Dare To Dream⁠63%
Newsweek⁠32%By Christopher Roberts⁠14% Jesus Mesa⁠29%7/22/2026, 9:00:00 AM