Topic summary
⁠18%1 analyzed article/video227 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dancing With The Stars results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Recency Bias, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 5.8% saturation with 53 hits. Analysis detected 269 faulty-reasoning hits from 908 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (8,649 of 21,674 topics). This Dancing With The Stars is worse (more manipulative) than 60.10% of the peer group.
Dancing With The Stars
Topic details
Total words: 908
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

60% percentile
025507510060.1% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles908 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.3%2.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.6%2.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 4.6%4.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 2.3%2.3%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 3.6%3.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 5.8%5.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Recency Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos