Topic summary
21%1 analyzed article/video484 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cpus results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Overconfidence Bias, and Halo Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 156 hits. Analysis detected 1,025 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,452 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 64% (4,269 of 11,858 topics). This Cpus is worse (more manipulative) than 64.00% of the peer group.
Cpus
Topic details
Total words: 1,452
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Cpus attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Cpus vs All Other Publications
Cpus attribute percentages, with an overlaid baseline for all publications (Overall) for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos