Topic summary
41%1 analyzed article/video382 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Community Investment results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Halo Effect, and Self-Serving Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 169 hits. Analysis detected 1,144 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,528 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 66% (6,535 of 18,748 topics). This Community Investment is worse (more manipulative) than 65.10% of the peer group.
Community Investment
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Community Investment attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Community Investment vs sitewide
Community Investment attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.