Topic summary

⁠6%1 analyzed article/video3,179 analyzed words

BS Summary: These College Sports Economics results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 2.6% saturation with 334 hits. Analysis detected 2,423 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,716 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠1% (20,383 of 20,474 topics). This College Sports Economics is better (less manipulative) than 99.60% of the peer group.

College Sports Economics

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	4-H Schedule	1%
⁠0%	4 H Schedule	1%
⁠0%	Cleveland Politics	1%
⁠0%	Summer Traditions	1%
⁠0%	Pittsburgh Pirates	1%
⁠1%	College Sports Economics (selected)	1%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%

Topic details

Total words: 12,716

Article count: 1

Authors

Dylan Halper

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

College Sports Economics attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

College Sports Economics vs sitewide

College Sports Economics attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

The Stakes for Wake⁠^6%

The Assembly NC⁠^6%By Dylan Halper⁠^6%7/30/2026, 3:55:00 AM