Topic summary
29%1 analyzed article/video398 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Civil Rights Advocacy results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and In-Group Bias, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 16.6% saturation with 264 hits. Analysis detected 1,546 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,592 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of 74% (4,430 of 16,838 topics). This Civil Rights Advocacy is worse (more manipulative) than 73.70% of the peer group.
Civil Rights Advocacy
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Civil Rights Advocacy attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Civil Rights Advocacy vs sitewide
Civil Rights Advocacy attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.