Topic summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Cincinnati Reds results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Negativity Bias, and Recency Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 137 hits. Analysis detected 503 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,848 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ā 0% (0 of 20,863 topics). This Cincinnati Reds is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Cincinnati Reds
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Cincinnati Reds attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Cincinnati Reds vs sitewide
Cincinnati Reds attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.