Topic summary
69%1 analyzed article/video1,357 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chipmaking results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Negativity Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 751 hits. Analysis detected 3,265 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,428 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 44% (12,716 of 22,505 topics). This Chipmaking is better (less manipulative) than 56.50% of the peer group.
Chipmaking
Topic details
Total words: 5,428
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

44% percentile
025507510043.5% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.0%5.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 13.8%13.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate