Topic summary
32%1 analyzed article/video5,924 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chinese Foreign Policy results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Overconfidence Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 1,630 hits. Analysis detected 7,769 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,772 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 3% (16,193 of 16,562 topics). This Chinese Foreign Policy is better (less manipulative) than 97.80% of the peer group.
Chinese Foreign Policy
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Chinese Foreign Policy attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Chinese Foreign Policy vs sitewide
Chinese Foreign Policy attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.