Topic summary
⁠39%1 analyzed article/video778 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Childhood Obesity results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 434 hits. Analysis detected 2,157 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,112 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (11,001 of 23,500 topics). This Childhood Obesity is worse (more manipulative) than 53.20% of the peer group.
Childhood Obesity
Topic details
Total words: 3,112
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

53% percentile
025507510053.2% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.6%5.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 13.9%13.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.4%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos