Author summary
40% 1 analyzed article/video 778 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Giana Loretta results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 434 hits . Analysis detected 2,157 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,112 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 61% (3,681 of 9,216 authors). This Giana Loretta is worse (more manipulative) than 60.10% of the peer group. Giana Loretta
Author details
Total words: 3,112
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.1% percentile 2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.4% 3.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 13.9% 13.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Anecdotal: Author 13.9%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.6%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.4% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst