Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Childcare Deserts results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.5% saturation with 353 hits. Analysis detected 1,190 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,392 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 24,545 topics). This Childcare Deserts is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Childcare Deserts
Topic details
Total words: 5,392
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.5%6.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.0%6.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 0.3%0.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 4.5%4.5%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Circular Reasoning: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.1%Appeal to Nature: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos