Topic summary
⁠28%1 analyzed article/video2,155 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Child Care Policy results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Slippery Slope, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 667 hits. Analysis detected 3,585 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,620 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (19,246 of 24,545 topics). This Child Care Policy is better (less manipulative) than 78.40% of the peer group.
Child Care Policy
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 8,620
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

22% percentile
025507510021.6% percentile
1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.7%7.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Middle Ground: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.1%Red Herring: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos