Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Charitable Giving results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Negativity Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 6.5% saturation with 123 hits. Analysis detected 1,699 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,884 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 13,028 topics). This Charitable Giving is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Charitable Giving
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Oakland Culture1%
⁠0%Dive Bars1%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
⁠0%Charitable Giving (selected)0%
Topic details
Total words: 1,884
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Charitable Giving attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Charitable Giving vs sitewide
Charitable Giving attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos