Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Central Texas Flooding results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 217 hits. Analysis detected 1,112 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,901 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 13,026 topics). This Central Texas Flooding is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Central Texas Flooding
Topic details
Total words: 2,901
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Central Texas Flooding attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Central Texas Flooding vs sitewide
Central Texas Flooding attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos