Topic summary
4%1 analyzed article/video1,116 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ceasefire Agreements results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Anchoring Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 6.8% saturation with 304 hits. Analysis detected 790 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,464 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 12% (18,499 of 21,012 topics). This Ceasefire Agreements is better (less manipulative) than 88.00% of the peer group.
Ceasefire Agreements
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Ceasefire Agreements attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Ceasefire Agreements vs sitewide
Ceasefire Agreements attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.