Topic summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video541 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Caves results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Overconfidence Bias, and Anchoring Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 3.9% saturation with 85 hits. Analysis detected 326 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,164 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ā 8% (12,067 of 13,018 topics). This Caves is better (less manipulative) than 92.70% of the peer group.
Caves
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Self-Driving Cars1%
ā 0%Self Driving Cars1%
ā 0%Oakland Culture1%
ā 0%Dive Bars1%
ā 8%Caves (selected)2%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 2,164
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Caves attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Caves vs sitewide
Caves attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos