Topic summary

⁠75%1 analyzed article/video671 analyzed words

BS Summary: These Carl Jung results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Indoctrination, and Framing Effect, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 16.2% saturation with 905 hits. Analysis detected 4,645 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,588 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (11,542 of 21,585 topics). This Carl Jung is better (less manipulative) than 53.50% of the peer group.

Carl Jung

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	4-H Schedule	1%
⁠0%	4 H Schedule	1%
⁠0%	Musician Biographies	1%
⁠0%	Cleveland Politics	1%
⁠0%	Summer Traditions	1%
⁠47%	Carl Jung (selected)	3%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%

Topic details

Total words: 5,588

Article count: 1

Authors

Steven A Hassan PhD

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

Carl Jung attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

Carl Jung vs sitewide

Carl Jung attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

The Cult of Jung⁠^56%

Psychology Today⁠^62%By Steven A Hassan PhD⁠^74%7/21/2026, 10:54:17 AM