Author summary
74% 1 analyzed article/video 671 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Steven A Hassan PhD results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Indoctrination , and Framing Effect , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 16.2% saturation with 905 hits . Analysis detected 4,645 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,588 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 53% (4,039 of 8,520 authors). This Steven A Hassan PhD is worse (more manipulative) than 52.60% of the peer group. Steven A Hassan PhD
Author details
Total words: 5,588
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
53% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 52.6% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.8% 8.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 16.2% 16.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 8.4% 8.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 19.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 16.2%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Indoctrination: Author 8.4%, sitewide 0.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.6%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Genetic Fallacy: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst