Author summary
74%1 analyzed article/video671 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Steven A Hassan PhD results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Indoctrination, and Framing Effect, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 16.2% saturation with 905 hits. Analysis detected 4,645 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,588 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 53% (4,039 of 8,520 authors). This Steven A Hassan PhD is worse (more manipulative) than 52.60% of the peer group.
Steven A Hassan PhD
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
53%Steven A Hassan PhD (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,588
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

53% percentile
025507510052.6% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.9%4.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.8%8.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 16.2%16.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 8.4%8.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.2%2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.9%4.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.6%0.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Author 16.2%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Indoctrination: Author 8.4%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.6%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Genetic Fallacy: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos