Topic summary

⁠0%1 analyzed article/video

BS Summary: These Campaign Finance Disclosures results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias, Framing Effect, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 187 hits. Analysis detected 1,568 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,064 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 14,686 topics). This Campaign Finance Disclosures is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.

Campaign Finance Disclosures

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	Pittsburgh Pirates	1%
⁠0%	Holocaust	1%
⁠0%	Privacy Policy	1%
⁠0%	Alameda County	1%
⁠0%	Terms Of Use	1%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%
⁠0%	Campaign Finance Disclosures (selected)	0%

Topic details

Total words: 2,064

Article count: 1

Authors

Simon D. Schuster

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

Campaign Finance Disclosures attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

Campaign Finance Disclosures vs sitewide

Campaign Finance Disclosures attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

Fact check: Is John James backed by data center developers?⁠^48%

Bridge Michigan⁠^62%By Simon D. Schuster⁠^0%7/21/2026, 9:11:08 PM