Topic summary

⁠0%1 analyzed article/video3,639 analyzed words

BS Summary: These Big Ten Conference results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Indoctrination, and Hasty Generalization, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 3.2% saturation with 466 hits. Analysis detected 4,814 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,556 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of ⁠1% (12,935 of 13,019 topics). This Big Ten Conference is better (less manipulative) than 99.40% of the peer group.

Big Ten Conference

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	Holocaust	1%
⁠0%	Self-Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Self Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Oakland Culture	1%
⁠0%	Dive Bars	1%
⁠1%	Big Ten Conference (selected)	1%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%

Topic details

Total words: 14,556

Article count: 1

Authors

Chuck Schilken

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

Big Ten Conference attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

Big Ten Conference vs sitewide

Big Ten Conference attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

Want to attend a Big Ten football game? Here’s a guide to all 18 stadiums⁠^43%

Los Angeles Times⁠^79%By Chuck Schilken⁠^8%9/5/2024, 10:00:46 AM