Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Army Test Ranges results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Anecdotal, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 130 hits. Analysis detected 443 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,388 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 24,545 topics). This Army Test Ranges is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Army Test Ranges
Topic details
Total words: 1,388
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.4%9.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 3.7%3.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 3.4%3.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 3.0%3.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 7.0%7.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 26.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos