Topic summary
⁠17%1 analyzed article/video702 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Antarctica results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Overconfidence Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 240 hits. Analysis detected 1,348 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,808 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (13,741 of 24,545 topics). This Antarctica is better (less manipulative) than 56.00% of the peer group.
Antarctica
Topic details
Total words: 2,808
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

44% percentile
025507510044.0% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.0%2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.4%Red Herring: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.7%Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos