Topic summary
ā 35%1 analyzed article/video333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Animal Nutrition results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, False Dilemma, and Anchoring Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 112 hits. Analysis detected 666 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,332 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ā 54% (10,218 of 21,823 topics). This Animal Nutrition is worse (more manipulative) than 53.20% of the peer group.
Animal Nutrition
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,332
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

53% percentile
025507510053.2% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.4%8.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Attempt to Sell a Productā€¦Sitewide 0.5%Topic 3.8%3.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 4.8%4.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 3.4%3.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%False Dilemma: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.2%Indoctrination: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Circular Reasoning: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos