Topic summary
⁠20%1 analyzed article/video217 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrew Painter results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 103 hits. Analysis detected 286 faulty-reasoning hits from 868 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (4,420 of 24,029 topics). This Andrew Painter is worse (more manipulative) than 81.60% of the peer group.
Andrew Painter
Topic details
Total words: 868
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

82% percentile
025507510081.6% percentile
4.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles868 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.7%5.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.0%7.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 11.9%11.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 2.3%2.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 4.0%4.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos