Topic summary
18%1 analyzed article/video1,010 analyzed words
BS Summary: These AI Spending results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Overconfidence Bias, and Halo Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 5.7% saturation with 232 hits. Analysis detected 1,480 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,040 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 14% (18,294 of 21,201 topics). This AI Spending is better (less manipulative) than 86.30% of the peer group.
AI Spending
Topic details
Total words: 4,040
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
AI Spending attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
AI Spending vs sitewide
AI Spending attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos