Topic summary

⁠23%1 analyzed article/video277 analyzed words

BS Summary: These AI In Science results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Framing Effect, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 73 hits. Analysis detected 316 faulty-reasoning hits from 831 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (4,070 of 15,085 topics). This AI In Science is worse (more manipulative) than 73.00% of the peer group.

AI In Science

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	Pittsburgh Pirates	1%
⁠0%	Opera	1%
⁠0%	Holocaust	1%
⁠0%	Privacy Policy	1%
⁠0%	Alameda County	1%
⁠73%	AI In Science (selected)	5%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%

Topic details

Total words: 831

Article count: 1

Authors

Anna Washenko

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

AI In Science attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

AI In Science vs sitewide

AI In Science attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

US outlines its $5 billion Genesis Mission to boost science with AI⁠^18%

Engadget⁠^39%By Anna Washenko⁠^53%7/22/2026, 8:54:26 PM