Topic summary
⁠35%1 analyzed article/video1,289 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Academic Pressure results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Anecdotal, and Biased Writer Voice, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 457 hits. Analysis detected 1,969 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,867 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (10,663 of 24,545 topics). This Academic Pressure is worse (more manipulative) than 56.60% of the peer group.
Academic Pressure
Topic details
Total words: 3,867
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

57% percentile
025507510056.6% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.3%2.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 11.8%11.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.4%0.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 7.9%7.9%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Indoctrination: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Straw Man: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.9%Composition/Division: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos