The7434%

Opinion: Students Are Anxious  And It’s No Surprise, Since We Teach Them to Be That Way 21%

By Erin Clabough35%

8/7/2026, 11:30:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Appeal to Authority, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 16.8% saturation with 216 hits. Analysis detected 2,094 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,289 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 27.6% and a BS Rank of 21% (24,378 of 30,584 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 79.70% of the article peer group.

Temporary anxiety can often surface before the first day of school. 
Sometimes, that can help kids get in the right mindset for a big day . 
But when anxiety becomes a constant feature of children’s and teenagers’ days, that stress doesn’t switch off when they leave the classroom or finish an exam. 
It can become the body’s normal, staying with learners long after graduation. 
I teach biology and neuroscience to undergraduates , and I believe that the way we educate our children  prioritizing performance and grades over curiosity and well-being  is producing a society full of anxiety-ridden adults. 
A recent survey of over 84,000 college students found that one-third of them self-reported moderate or severe anxiety, and roughly the same share self-reported depression . 
I’ve seen this unfold in ways I am only just starting to understand. 
A few years ago, one of my neuroscience students, whom I will call Hannah to protect her privacy, described how she experienced high school only as a way to get a scholarship to attend college. 
She became, in her words, a “complete robot.” 
“I developed extreme anxiety; it like completely took over my life,” she said. 
“There was no excitement to learn.” 
Learning can be fun, but isn’t always 
Learning, as experienced by young children, is normally very rewarding. 
When organic, it is delightful, immersive, timeless and fun . 
Curiosity itself triggers a dopamine response in children’s brains. 
Researchers describe it as a  curiosity loop ,” in which the brain predicts something, runs into something new or unexpected, releases dopamine, and the child is hooked, chasing the answer because it feels good to find it. 
As kids grow, they take on more homework and more exams, and have more evaluation tied to specific benchmarks, like grades, which can inadvertently cut off the curiosity loop. 
Some educators argue that grades help keep students accountable, push them to work harder even on material they wouldn’t otherwise prioritize, and give teachers a shared standard, however imperfect, for tracking whether learning is happening. 
Others argue, meanwhile, that grades are not actually an accurate representation of what students are learning. 
They can also cause students to experience academic pressure. 
Research shows that a high degree of academic pressure stems from fear of failure, chronic stress about workload and exams, worry about parental expectations and competition with peers for grades. 
Though many things impact well-being, academic pressure is related to kids’ mental health in a well-documented way. 
A 2026 study, for example, found that academic pressure to achieve at age 15 can predict depressive symptoms that persist into adulthood. 
Grades aren’t the only source of pressure that students experience. 
Social comparison plays a role, too, along with the pressure to only answer questions when they’re already sure, to never seem confused and to stay constantly productive. 
Based on my experience and research, kids pick up on the message that they should keep their curiosity at a 5 out of 10 scale, instead of a 10 out of 10, especially if it strays outside the curriculum. 
Related How Early Stress Shapes the Developing Brain 
Learning to avoid fear and pain 
A theory dating back more than 100 years suggested that there is an optimal amount of stress for good performance, based on a study that had nothing to do with humans. 
Researchers ran mice through a maze, using electric shocks to punish wrong choices. 
On harder tasks, moderate shocks produced the fastest learning, while stronger shocks made it worse . 
Over the years, this got reinterpreted into claims about punishment, reward, motivation and stress in humans . 
But the original study was about how animals learn to avoid fear and pain, not about optimal learning at all. 
Once a mouse learns to avoid a shock, escape itself triggers dopamine release; in other words, the escape  not the discovery  is the reward. 
How stress shapes the brain 
In 1855, engineers coined the word  stress ,” from the word “distress,” to describe a beam pulled, pushed or twisted from multiple directions until the strain shows as a deformation. 
Apply distress to a young brain, and the deformation isn’t just in the education process, but in the neurodevelopment of people’s minds. 
Over time, chronic stress reshapes the hippocampus, a part of the brain where memories get encoded, making learning itself harder . 
Chronic stress blunts people’s dopamine response, so nothing feels quite as rewarding , which can look like depression . 
Chronic stress also reshapes the prefrontal cortex, impairing our ability to manage stress overall . 
Each stressor lowers the bar for the next one, until anxiety becomes less a reaction than a preset that follows a student long after they’ve left the classroom . 
Chronic stress has implications for general health too, and can cause inflammatory and autoimmune symptoms . 
I see conditions like chronic pain and panic disorders in my students every semester. 
Related How Dads’ Stress and Mental Health Can Influence Their Children’s Development 
Unlearning old habits 
In college, Hannah shared that she is still healing from some of that anxiety and has worked to “unlearn the study habits” she developed in high school. 
“I was that person always in the library, like you’re going to study, study, study. 
Wake up at 5:30, do this. 
Check every box perfectly and not halfway,” Hannah said. 
Through journaling and reading, Hannah began noticing the subconscious patterns she’d been repeating since childhood. 
That process, along with years of talk therapy, let her separate real learning from what she calls “programming,” so she no longer needs that rigidity to feel like she was learning. 
I interviewed Hannah this past spring as part of a book I am writing about how people actually experience learning, and what a living systems approach to education could offer them instead. 
Living systems theory says the goal of a system is what it actually produces, not what it intends  an idea I’m applying directly to education . 
This plays out in our current educational environment in the United States. 
In my view, even if educators, parents and policymakers say their intent is to build lifelong learners, they are reliably producing anxious, burnt-out students. 
Anxiety, then, is functionally what our education system’s goal is. 
It’s not what the system says it does, it’s what it does. 
Engineers coined the word ‘stress’ in 1855 from the word ‘distress,’ to describe a beam being pulled or twisted until it shifts shape and develops a deformation. 
Klaus Vedfelt/DigitalVision/Getty Images 
A different approach 
Since I’ve learned that at least a third of students in my college classrooms are struggling with mental health, I’ve changed the way I teach. 
I have altered my courses to seek out pockets of wonder, simultaneously supporting learning and well-being. 
In my 300-person course with pre-med students, I no longer only teach through lecturing. 
Instead, I emphasize our humanity and curiosity, while also teaching very difficult content. 
I provide a solid structure, emphasize that everyone belongs and ask them to teach each other. 
I use real-world situations and games, give students choice within their assignments and offer opportunities for reflection. 
And yes, I use a traditional grading system. 
Learning can require persistence and struggle, and no one benefits from a classroom without challenge. 
But struggle and dread aren’t the same thing. 
Does stress belong in learning? 
Maybe, maybe not. 
The first step is recognizing that the U.S. built an education system that runs on stress  not because we meant to, but because most people did not notice. 
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. 
Read the original article . 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 12.0%Erin Clabough: 11.8%CalMatters: 2.4%Confirmation Bias12.0%This article: 3.0%Erin Clabough: 0.8%CalMatters: 0.2%Anchoring Bias3.0%This article: 4.0%Erin Clabough: 1.0%CalMatters: 0.8%Availability Heuristic4.0%This article: 2.0%Erin Clabough: 1.9%CalMatters: 0.3%Representativeness Heuristic2.0%This article: 2.4%Erin Clabough: 0.7%CalMatters: 0.3%Hindsight Bias2.4%This article: 0.0%Erin Clabough: 0.4%CalMatters: 0.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Erin Clabough: 1.9%CalMatters: 3.2%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Erin Clabough: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.7%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Erin Clabough: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Erin Clabough: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 9.5%Erin Clabough: 0.0%CalMatters: 3.0%Optimism Bias9.5%This article: 8.8%Erin Clabough: 1.1%CalMatters: 1.2%Pessimism Bias8.8%This article: 15.4%Erin Clabough: 2.2%CalMatters: 5.0%Negativity Bias15.4%This article: 0.0%Erin Clabough: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 2.2%Erin Clabough: 0.6%CalMatters: 0.3%Fundamental Attribution Error2.2%This article: 0.0%Erin Clabough: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Erin Clabough: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Erin Clabough: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Erin Clabough: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.8%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Erin Clabough: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Erin Clabough: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 1.7%Erin Clabough: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.3%Recency Bias1.7%This article: 0.0%Erin Clabough: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.1%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Erin Clabough: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Erin Clabough: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 2.7%Erin Clabough: 0.5%CalMatters: 0.5%Straw Man2.7%This article: 13.9%Erin Clabough: 0.0%CalMatters: 1.9%Appeal to Authority13.9%This article: 4.7%Erin Clabough: 0.6%CalMatters: 0.6%False Dilemma4.7%This article: 3.6%Erin Clabough: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.8%Slippery Slope3.6%This article: 1.7%Erin Clabough: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Circular Reasoning1.7%This article: 16.8%Erin Clabough: 8.2%CalMatters: 1.9%Hasty Generalization16.8%This article: 0.0%Erin Clabough: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Erin Clabough: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 1.2%Erin Clabough: 1.1%CalMatters: 3.6%Appeal to Emotion1.2%This article: 0.0%Erin Clabough: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.4%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 13.4%Erin Clabough: 2.4%CalMatters: 0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)13.4%This article: 0.0%Erin Clabough: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Erin Clabough: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.1%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 1.6%Erin Clabough: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Appeal to Nature1.6%This article: 0.0%Erin Clabough: 0.6%CalMatters: 0.0%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 14.0%Erin Clabough: 7.9%CalMatters: 2.6%Anecdotal14.0%This article: 0.0%Erin Clabough: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 3.3%Erin Clabough: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)3.3%This article: 0.0%Erin Clabough: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.2%Erin Clabough: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.1%Middle Ground0.2%This article: 0.0%Erin Clabough: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Erin Clabough: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 6.9%Erin Clabough: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy6.9%This article: 2.1%Erin Clabough: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.3%Unattributed Quote2.1%This article: 0.6%Erin Clabough: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.1%Quote-first Misdirection0.6%This article: 12.7%Erin Clabough: 5.8%CalMatters: 1.6%Biased Writer Voice12.7%This article: 2.1%Erin Clabough: 1.3%CalMatters: 0.5%Indoctrination2.1%This article: 0.0%Erin Clabough: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Erin Clabough: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Erin Clabough: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

1289 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker6.5%attributed speech1,205writer words
Selected voice

Hannah

82%flagged-word coverage
84 attributed words100% of attributed speech84% writer coverage
0%17.5%35.0%Unattributed Quote+32.1 ptsWriter: 0.0%Hannah: 32.1%32.1%Biased Writer Voice-13.6 ptsWriter: 13.6%Hannah: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection+9.5 ptsWriter: 0.0%Hannah: 9.5%9.5%Indoctrination-2.2 ptsWriter: 2.2%Hannah: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.