Topic summary

⁠0%1 analyzed article/video694 analyzed words

BS Summary: These 2026 World Cup: North America results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 25.5% saturation with 531 hits. Analysis detected 2,442 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,082 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (2,373 of 11,454 topics). This 2026 World Cup: North America is worse (more manipulative) than 79.30% of the peer group.

2026 World Cup: North America

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	Holocaust	1%
⁠0%	Self-Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Self Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Survival Stories	1%
⁠0%	Gender Identity	1%
⁠80%	2026 World Cup: North America (selected)	7%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%

Topic details

Total words: 2,082

Article count: 1

Authors

Rafael Nam

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

2026 World Cup: North America attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

2026 World Cup: North America vs All Other Publications

2026 World Cup: North America attribute percentages, with an overlaid baseline for all publications (Overall) for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

Hotels have a big World Cup problem: Bookings are running far below projections⁠^71%

NPR⁠^0%By Rafael Nam⁠^0%5/4/2026, 9:56:29 PM