Speaker summary
44%1 analyzed article/video35.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Zach Schira results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Unattributed Quote, and Confirmation Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 34.9% saturation with 15 hits. Analysis detected 58 faulty-reasoning hits from 35.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 33.7% and a BS Rank of 53% (13,538 of 28,364 speakers). This Zach Schira is worse (more manipulative) than 52.30% of the peer group.
Zach Schira
Speaker details