Speaker summary
56%4 analyzed articles/videos339.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Yul-san Liem results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and False Dilemma, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 24.7% saturation with 130 hits. Analysis detected 964.821 faulty-reasoning hits from 339.333 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 9.5% and a BS Rank of 11% (24,269 of 27,037 speakers). This Yul-san Liem is better (less manipulative) than 89.80% of the peer group.
Yul-san Liem
Speaker details