Speaker summary
52%1 analyzed article/video97.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Xin Tian results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Anecdotal, with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 40.1% saturation with 65 hits. Analysis detected 334.036 faulty-reasoning hits from 97.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 26.3% and a BS Rank of 43% (16,321 of 28,364 speakers). This Xin Tian is better (less manipulative) than 57.50% of the peer group.
Xin Tian
Speaker details