Speaker summary
68%1 analyzed article/video56 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wyoming Public Health Laboratory results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Availability Heuristic, and Biased Writer Voice, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 55.4% saturation with 31 hits. Analysis detected 155 faulty-reasoning hits from 56 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 55.4% and a BS Rank of 74% (7,621 of 28,364 speakers). This Wyoming Public Health Laboratory is worse (more manipulative) than 73.10% of the peer group.
Wyoming Public Health Laboratory
Speaker details