Speaker summary
85%1 analyzed article/video11 analyzed words
BS Summary: These WRAL meteorologists results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 11 hits. Analysis detected 22 faulty-reasoning hits from 11 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 84% (4,544 of 26,884 speakers). This WRAL meteorologists is worse (more manipulative) than 83.10% of the peer group.
WRAL meteorologists
Speaker details