Speaker summary
85%1 analyzed article/video43 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Worrell and Culpepper results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Negativity Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 43 hits. Analysis detected 43 faulty-reasoning hits from 43 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 84% (4,748 of 28,364 speakers). This Worrell and Culpepper is worse (more manipulative) than 83.30% of the peer group.
Worrell and Culpepper
Speaker details