Speaker summary
72%1 analyzed article/video80 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Worrell results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Primacy Effect, and Recency Bias, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 36.3% saturation with 29 hits. Analysis detected 158 faulty-reasoning hits from 80 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 32.9% and a BS Rank of 51% (13,902 of 28,364 speakers). This Worrell is worse (more manipulative) than 51.00% of the peer group.
Worrell
Speaker details