Speaker summary
48%11 analyzed articles/videos214.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These World Bank results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias, Recency Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 52.6% saturation with 232 hits. Analysis detected 554.659 faulty-reasoning hits from 214.667 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 15.8% and a BS Rank of 24% (21,574 of 28,364 speakers). This World Bank is better (less manipulative) than 76.10% of the peer group.
World Bank
Speaker details
Total words: 214.667
Article count: 11
Authors