Speaker summary
⁠85%1 analyzed article/video18 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Woods results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 18 hits. Analysis detected 36 faulty-reasoning hits from 18 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠84% (4,735 of 28,364 speakers). This Woods is worse (more manipulative) than 83.30% of the peer group.
Woods
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠84%Woods (selected)100%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 18
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos