Speaker summary
76%1 analyzed article/video41.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These William Lu results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, False Dilemma, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 34.875 hits. Analysis detected 189.875 faulty-reasoning hits from 41.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 54.2% and a BS Rank of 71% (5,742 of 19,651 speakers). This William Lu is worse (more manipulative) than 70.80% of the peer group.
William Lu
Speaker details