Speaker summary
ā 48%1 analyzed article/video90.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These William Connell results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Hindsight Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 36.1% saturation with 43 hits. Analysis detected 163.687 faulty-reasoning hits from 90.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 36% and a BS Rank of ā 55% (12,898 of 28,364 speakers). This William Connell is worse (more manipulative) than 54.50% of the peer group.
William Connell
Speaker details