Speaker summary
51%1 analyzed article/video108.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These William Berman results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 32.6% saturation with 58 hits. Analysis detected 295.664 faulty-reasoning hits from 108.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 13.8% and a BS Rank of 20% (21,120 of 26,155 speakers). This William Berman is better (less manipulative) than 80.70% of the peer group.
William Berman
Speaker details