Speaker summary
⁠77%1 analyzed article/video43.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These William Barr results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Begging the Question, Unattributed Quote, and False Dilemma, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 62.1% saturation with 36 hits. Analysis detected 128.375 faulty-reasoning hits from 43.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 32.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (13,979 of 28,364 speakers). This William Barr is worse (more manipulative) than 50.70% of the peer group.
William Barr
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠51%William Barr (selected)33%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 43.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos