Speaker summary
85%1 analyzed article/video90 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wells Fargo analyst Aaron Rakers results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Middle Ground, and Negativity Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 78.9% saturation with 71 hits. Analysis detected 374 faulty-reasoning hits from 90 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 69.3% and a BS Rank of 80% (5,921 of 28,364 speakers). This Wells Fargo analyst Aaron Rakers is worse (more manipulative) than 79.10% of the peer group.
Wells Fargo analyst Aaron Rakers
Speaker details