Speaker summary
⁠85%1 analyzed article/video164 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Warren results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Recency Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 72% saturation with 118 hits. Analysis detected 321 faulty-reasoning hits from 164 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 32.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (13,986 of 28,364 speakers). This Warren is worse (more manipulative) than 50.70% of the peer group.
Warren
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠51%Warren (selected)33%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 164
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos