Speaker summary
56%1 analyzed article/video73.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Utah Democratic Party results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 69.1% saturation with 57 hits. Analysis detected 251 faulty-reasoning hits from 73.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 33.1% and a BS Rank of 52% (13,852 of 28,364 speakers). This Utah Democratic Party is worse (more manipulative) than 51.20% of the peer group.
Utah Democratic Party
Speaker details